2012年2月13日月曜日

PDF関連ソフト

大学の講義も終わったので身の回りの整理をしているのだが、役割のかぶっているPDF関連ソフトなどがいろいろあったので、整理するついでにまとめてみる
  閲覧系
  Adobe Reader X
説明省略、印刷機能がわりと優秀な気がする。ただ、Acrobat.com サービスがいかにも無料で使えるような配置はやめて欲しい
  Foxit J-Reader
フリーのPDF閲覧ソフトの1つ、後述のXChange Viewerとできることにあまり違いはないが、なぜか使わなくなった。パワーポイントチックに閲覧、編集できるのが魅力。iPhoneのアプリがあった気がする
  PDF-XChange Viewer
メインで使っている閲覧ソフト、編集バーをうまくカスタマイズしないと肝心の閲覧部分が上2つより狭くなるのが難点。J-Readerと違い、PDFを分割して画像データにして出力できたりする。

  編集系
  CutePDF
仮想プリンタを介して印刷できるファイルならpdfにしてしまうpdf作成ソフト。
  即変(JpegEx)PDF
仮想プリンタを介さずにPDFを作成するソフト、ただしjpg限定?
試しにTIFで試したらうまくいかなかった
  PDF Scissors
PDFの余白をカットできる。Java利用
  PDFor sell
PDFの分割、統合を1つでやってのけるソフト、
  123 PDF to Image
PDFファイルを画像に変換するソフト、拡張子も選べる。
X-Change Viewerで同じことができるため、いらない子に
  Pdfpdfpdf
複数のpdf1つに統合するソフト、PDFor sellの登場でいらない子疑惑が
  pdf Knife
PDFをページごとに分割、抽出するソフト、PDFor sellの登場で(ry
  pdfcrack
パスワードをかけたPDFのパスワードを解析するソフト、コマンドプロンプトを利用する。パスワードを忘れたpdfを見るときに有効
しかし、PDFのパスワード解析サイトができたせいであまり使わない


・おまけ
仮想プリンタを介したドキュメント作成が便利すぎる。CutePDFだけでなく、XPS Document Writerや Document Image Writerにはお世話になった。

ラベル: ,

2012年2月3日金曜日


On the morning of February 12, 2005, on a secluded path deep in Brazil’s Amazon rain forest, two gunmen confronted a 73-year-old nun named Dorothy Stang. The nun warned the gunmen that the forest was not theirs and that they had no right to clear-cut the trees to plant grasses for their cattle.


“So, you don’t like to eat meat?” one of the men taunted.


“Not enough to destroy the forest for it,” she replied.
“If this problem isn’t resolved today, it’s never going to be,” the man said.
According to a witness, who later appeared at the two men’s trial, Stang saw him reach for his gun. She opened her Bible and read, “Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be satisfied.” As she turned to go, one of the men aimed his gun at her and pulled the trigger.
The Batt1e for the Amazon
“The death of the forest is the end of our lives,” Stang would tell her followers, mostly poor family farmers who had settled small plots of land along the Trans-Amazonian Highway, the largest road cutting through the Amazon rain forest. Stang encouraged farmers to live and work in harmony with the Amazon ecosystem, in contrast with large-scale cattle ranchers and land speculators whose widespread tree-cutting often results in the destruction of entire ecosystems. She worked to educate poor farmers, organizing them and encouraging them to resist the ranchers and speculators who want the same land who are sometimes ready to use violent methods to obtain it.
During the past 40 years, close to 20 percent of the Amazon rain forest has been cut down more than in all the previous 450 years since European colonization began. Scientists fear that an additional 20 percent of the trees will be lost over the next two decades. If that happens, the forest’s ecology may begin to fall apart. Intact, the Amazon produces half its on rainfall through the water it releases into the atmosphere. Eliminate enough of that rain through clearing, and the remaining trees dry out and die. The natural result is an increase in forest fires burning out of control.
Much of the destruction of the Amazon is done illegally. Incredibly, there are more than 160,000 kilometers (100,000 miles) of illegal logging roads throughout the forest. Once the trees have been cut down and taken away, the logging roads provide access to the forest for ranchers, farmers, settlers, and others attracted by the promise of free land. There is great competition, and gunmen are frequently recruited as a way to protect settlers’ claims.
The production of fake, illegal titles to Amazon land has become so common that Brazilians have a name for it: grilagem, from the Portuguese word grilo, which means “cricket.” In order to make fake land titles look older and therefore more authentic, grileiros, as the people who steal land by creating false titles have come to be known, put the documents in drawers full of hungry crickets. The crickets eat some of the pages and make the documents look older. The practice certainly widespread: in just three years, the Brazilian government discovered 62,000 questionable land titles.
A Clash of ideals
What’s happening today in Amazonia is clash between two models of development,” said Felicio Pontes, one of a new group of government lawyers seeking to prosecute land fraud and environmental crimes in the Amazon. The first model is based on logging and cutting down trees to create large cattle ranches and plantations, usually undertaken by big business. It devastates the forest. The alternative model, advocated by Dorothy Stang, is what Pontes calls social environmentalism. This newer model encourages small-scale family farms that work together and manage the forest in sustainable ways.
Perhaps the best-known representative of the first model is Blairo Maggi, the governor of the state of Mato Grosso. Maggi is often portrayed by the environmental movement representing big business and rapid destruction of the rain forest. The non-governmental organization Greenpeace has given Maggi, who is known as ”the King of Soy” because the company he founded is the world’s largest single producer of soy beans, its Golden Chainsaw8 Award for leading Brazil in deforestation for three straight years.
Not all environmentalists see Maggi in a completely negative light, however. He is known for respecting private property, he doesn’t allow any land to be cleared illegally, he doesn’t make use of slave labor, and he is careful not to use agricultural chemicals within 500 meters (0.3 miles) of a stream. “We are very responsible environmentally and socially,” Maggi says. To Maggi, deforestation is an exaggerated issue. He thinks people fear it because they do not understand how enormous the Amazon
really is. “All of Europe could fit inside the Amazon,” he says, “and we’d still have room for two Englands.” And what does Maggi think of Dorothy Stang’s vision of small growers living and farming in harmony with the land?
Totalmente errado
----completely wrong,” Maggi says. He believes that such projects as Stang’s won’t succeed because they don’t take the laws of business into consideration. He believes that it is useless to fight the big business model because it makes the most efficient use of the land and can maximize production. As production grows, prices fall to levels such that it is no longer feasible for small producers to compete without a great deal of financial help from the government
A Cause for Hope
Stang would have been pleased when in February 2006, coinciding with the one-year anniversary of her death, Brazil’s president announced the protection of 65,000 square kilometers (25,000 square miles) of rain forest. Although grileiros still operate freely over wide areas of the Amazon, they will be kept out of the protected area. Some environmentally responsible logging will be allowed, but no clear-cutting or settlements will be permitted.
Additionally, an older law that restricts farmers to clearing no more than 20 percent of their land is finally being enforced. If properly followed, this law could radically change the current patterns of deforestation. While in the past most farmers have largely ignored the law, in the years since Stang was murdered government pressure has increased on grileiros and farmers who have cleared too large a percentage of their land. In Mato Grosso, Governor Maggi helps such farmers by allowing them to buy up forest areas adjacent to their farms in order to supplement their percentage of forested land: Thanks to these and other efforts, recent forest surveys seem to indicate a decrease in the rate of deforestation of the Amazon. However, the fight to protect the forest is not over yet. There is a long way to go before Dorothy Stang’s dream of a protected and sustainable Amazon is realized.




Critical Thinking


Is your point of view about using the Amazon rain forest closer to Dorothy Stang, to Blairo Maggi, or do you have another point of view?

ラベル:


One cloudless midsummer day, Andrew Parker, an evolutionary biologist, knelt in the baking red sand of an Australian desert and gently placed the right back leg of a thorny devil into a dish of water. The thorny devil, a small lizard that has learned to survive in the baking heat of the Australian desert, has a secret that fascinated Parker. "Look, look!" he exclaimed, "Its back is completely drenched!" Sure enough, in less than a minute, water from the dish had traveled up the lizard's leg, across its skin, and into its mouth. It was, in essence, drinking through its foot. The thorny devil can also do this when standing on damp sand vital competitive advantage in the desert. Parker had come here to solve the
riddle of precisely how it does this, not from purely biological interest, but with a concrete purpose in mind: to make a device to help people collect water in the desert.

From Natural Wonder to Useful Tool

Parker is a leading scientist in the field of biomimetics designs from nature to solve problems in engineering, materials science, medicine, and other fields. His studies of the body coverings of butterflies and beetles have led to brighter screens for cell phones. He sometimes draws inspiration from nature’s past: while visiting a museum in Warsaw, Poland, he noticed a 45-million-year-old fly trapped in amber and observed how the shape of its eye’s surface reduced light reflection. This shape is now being used in solar panels.

As the next phase in his plan to create a water-collection device inspired by the lizard, Parker sent his observations and experimental results to Michael Rubner and Robert Cohen, two colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. On the one hand, Parker is full of inspiration and enthusiasm about the many possibilities of biomimetics. On the other, Rubner and Cohen are much more practical and focus on the ideas that actually have a chance of being applied successfully. This combination of biological insight and engineering pragmatism5 is vital to success in biomimetics, and has led to several promising technologies.
Though Rubner and Cohen are certainly impressed by biological structures, they consider nature merely a starting point for innovation. Cohen says, ”The natural structure provides a clue to what is useful. . . But maybe you can do it better.” Ultimately, they consider a biomimetics project a success only if it has the potential to make a useful tool for people. ”Looking at pretty structures in nature is not sufficient,” says Cohen. ”What I want to know is, can we actually transform these structures into [something] with true utility in the real world?”

Unlocking Nature’s Secrets
The work of Parker, Rubner, and Cohen is only one part of a growing global biomimetics movement. Scientists around the world are studying and trying to copy a wide variety of nature’s design secrets, with the goal of using them to create something useful. In the United States, researchers are looking at the shape of humpback whale fins in order to improve windmills that generate electric energy. The shape of the body of a certain fish has inspired designers at Mercedes-Benz to develop a more efficient car design. By analyzing how termites keep their large nests at the right temperature and humidity, architects in Zimbabwe hope to build more comfortable buildings. And in Japan, medical researchers have developed a painless needle that is similar in shape to the proboscis of a mosquito.

The Bio-Inspired Robot
Potentially, one of the most useful applications of biomimetics is the robot. Robots can perform tasks that might be too boring or dangerous for humans, but such robots are extremely difficult to build. Professor Ronald Fearing of the University of California is creating a tiny robot fly that can be used in surveillance or rescue operations. Fearing’s fly is a much simplified copy of the real thing. “Some things are just too mysterious and complicated to be able to replicate,” he says. It will still be years before his robot fly can perform anything like an actual fly, but Fearing is confident that over time he will close the gap between nature and human engineering.

At Stanford University in California, Mark Cutkosky is working on a robot gecko. As long ago as the fifth century B.C., the Greek philosopher Aristotle was amazed at how this small lizard “can run up and down a tree in any way, even with the head downward.” Cutkosky studied the extremely small structures on the gecko’s feet that allow it to run up and down vertical walls as easily as humans run down the street. He applied what he learned to create Stickybot, a robot that can walk up and down smooth vertical surfaces made, for example, of glass or plastic. The U.S. military, which funds the project, hopes that one day Stickybot will be able to climb up a building and stay there for days, monitoring the area below. Cutkosky hypothesizes a range of non-military uses as well. ”I’m trying to get robots to go places where they’ve never gone before,” he says. For now, Stickybot only climbs very clean and smooth surfaces quite slowly unlike a real gecko, which can run up just about any surface very quickly.

However, despite the promise of the field, and the brilliant people who work in it, biomimetics has led to surprisingly few business successes. Perhaps only one product has become truly famous—Velcro, which was invented in 1948 by Swiss chemist George de Mestral, who copied the way seeds called cockleburs stuck to his dog’s fur. Some blame industry, whose short-term expectations about how soon a project should be completed and become profitable conflict with the time-consuming nature of biomimetics research. But the main reason biomimetics hasn’t yet been a business success is that nature is inherently and unimaginably complex. For the present, engineers cannot hope to reproduce it.

Nonetheless, the gap with nature is gradually closing. Researchers are using more powerful microscopes, high-speed computers, and other new technologies to learn more from nature. A growing number of biomimetic materials are being produced. And although the field of biomimetics has yet to become a very successful commercial industry, it has already developed into a powerful new tool for understanding nature’s secrets.



Critical Thinking
Which feature of an animal or plant not mentioned in the reading do you think would be useful to replicate? Can you think of a practical use for it?



ラベル: